<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Boy Scout on pavsaund.com</title><link>https://www.pavsaund.com/tags/boy-scout/</link><description>Recent content in Boy Scout on pavsaund.com</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.pavsaund.com/tags/boy-scout/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The boy scout rule</title><link>https://www.pavsaund.com/2014/10/26/the-boy-scout-rule/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pavsaund.com/2014/10/26/the-boy-scout-rule/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I had the discussion with a colleague on how new code was being added to a code-base without maintainability in mind. The discussion was sparked by a code-review that had been ping-ponging between the reviewer and the developer where readability and ( as a result ) maintainability was an issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>